Loading...

24/7 Case Review: 210-940-9440
Call Now Free Case Evaluation
Baby Formula NEC

Which Baby Formula Products Are Named in the NEC Lawsuits?

Jennifer McDonald

October 25, 2025

baby formulas in NEC lawsuit

If your premature infant developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed in the NICU, you may be wondering about the specific products involved in the ongoing litigation. This guide identifies the main baby formulas in NEC lawsuit and explains why they are being targeted.

Key Takeaways: The NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit

  • The Scientific Link: Decades of research show that cow’s milk-based baby formulas, such as Similac® and Enfamil®, significantly increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. NEC is a severe and often fatal intestinal disease that causes inflammation and death of intestinal tissue.
  • The Legal Claim: Hundreds of families are filing lawsuits against manufacturers Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson. The core legal argument is “failure to warn” — that the companies knew their products posed a deadly risk to preemies but deliberately chose not to add a warning label for parents and doctors.
  • Your Family’s Rights: If your premature infant was fed a cow’s milk-based formula in the hospital and was later diagnosed with NEC, your family may be eligible to seek significant compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and more. Our team is actively investigating these claims to help families get the justice they deserve.

Ready to Fight for Your Compensation?

Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is Waiting!

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to call? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today

The Problem with Cow’s Milk-Based Formula for Preemies

Necrotizing enterocolitis is a dangerous inflammatory condition that can destroy an infant’s intestinal tissue, leading to life-threatening infections and lifelong complications. While the exact cause is multifactorial, one of the most well-documented risk factors for premature infants is being fed formula made from cow’s milk.  

For over 30 years, scientific studies have shown that premature babies fed cow’s milk-based formula are significantly more likely to develop NEC than those fed an exclusive diet of human breast milk. Human milk contains protective antibodies and immune cells that a preemie’s underdeveloped gut needs to mature and fight infection.  

The lawsuits allege that the manufacturers of the leading formula brands, Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, knew about this risk for decades but failed to warn parents and doctors. Instead, they marketed their products as safe and even medically necessary for premature infants.

Similac Products Named in NEC Lawsuits

Similac, manufactured by Abbott Laboratories, is one of the two primary brands at the center of the NEC litigation. The lawsuits specifically target their cow’s milk-based products that are frequently used in NICUs for premature and low-birth-weight infants.

Similac products commonly cited in lawsuits include:

  • Similac Special Care (20, 24, 30)
  • Similac Special Care High Protein
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier
  • Similac NeoSure
  • Similac Alimentum
  • Similac EleCare

These products are designed to provide extra calories and nutrients to help premature babies grow. However, the lawsuits argue that their bovine-based protein is inflammatory to a preemie’s fragile gut, triggering the dangerous response that leads to NEC.  

Your child’s future shouldn’t be defined by a preventable tragedy. Taking the first step toward legal action is about securing the resources they need and ensuring no other family suffers the same fate.

A Note on “Human Milk Fortifiers”

It is critical to understand that many products labeled as “Human Milk Fortifiers” are also made from cow’s milk. These powders are added to human breast milk to increase its caloric content. Lawsuits allege that adding these bovine-based fortifiers negates the protective benefits of breast milk and introduces the same risk of NEC as formula.  

Enfamil Products Named in NEC Lawsuits

Enfamil, manufactured by Mead Johnson & Company, is the other major brand facing hundreds of lawsuits over the risk of NEC. Like Similac, the claims focus on their cow’s milk-based formulas and fortifiers marketed for premature infants.

Enfamil products commonly cited in lawsuits include:

  • Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier (Acidified Liquid, Powder, and Standard Protein)
  • Enfamil NeuroPro EnfaCare
  • Enfamil Premature (20, 24, 30)
  • Enfacare Powder
  • Enfamil 24 Cal

These products were aggressively marketed to hospitals and NICUs as a safe way to meet the unique nutritional needs of premature babies. The lawsuits contend that this marketing was misleading because it failed to disclose the known link to a devastating intestinal disease.  

Are Other Baby Formula Brands Involved?

While the vast majority of lawsuits focus on Similac and Enfamil due to their market dominance, the core issue is the use of any cow’s milk-based formula in premature infants. Other brands that use cow’s milk, including store brands and organic varieties, may pose a similar risk.  

The litigation has centered on Abbott and Mead Johnson because their products are the most widely used in hospital NICUs across the country, where most cases of NEC occur.

What to Do If Your Child Was Fed a Formula Named in the Lawsuits

If your child was born prematurely, fed a cow’s milk-based formula or fortifier, and was subsequently diagnosed with NEC, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit. It is important to act quickly, as strict time limits (statutes of limitations) apply.  

Many parents are unsure of the exact products their baby received in the NICU. An experienced NEC baby formula lawyer can help you obtain and review your child’s medical records to identify the specific formulas and fortifiers that were used. This is a critical first step in determining if you have a valid claim for compensation.

Ready to Take the First Step Toward Justice?

Speak with our trusted legal team today. Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is waiting — and it only takes a minute to begin.

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to talk now? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today

Secure Form 100% Secure & Confidential | No Obligation No Obligation Consultation

By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by a trusted legal partner for a free case review. This does not create an attorney-client relationship. Confidential and secure.

Holding manufacturers accountable can provide the financial resources your family needs for your child’s long-term care and can help prevent other families from experiencing the same tragedy. Contact a legal professional to understand your rights and options.

“Justice for your child has a deadline. In NEC lawsuits, delay equals denial. Act now.”

— Visit MassTortTraffic.com or Call (+1) 210-940-9440

EXTERNAL SOURCES

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH) – Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC): https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/nec
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics – Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) Overview: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/necrotizing-enterocolitis-nec/
  3. U.S. Surgeon General – The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding (mentions NEC risk):(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513357/)

Frequently Asked Questions About the NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit

Section 1: The Basics of NEC and the Lawsuit

The lawsuits allege that manufacturers of cow’s milk-based formulas, specifically Abbott Laboratories (maker of Similac®) and Mead Johnson (maker of Enfamil®), knew for decades that their products significantly increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants but failed to warn parents and doctors.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious and often life-threatening intestinal disease that primarily affects premature and low-birth-weight infants. It causes severe inflammation that can destroy intestinal tissue, leading to a hole (perforation) in the gut, which can cause overwhelming infections like sepsis.

The lawsuits primarily name cow’s milk-based products from Similac and Enfamil that are designed for premature infants. These include specialized formulas and “human milk fortifiers” (which are also bovine-based) such as Similac Special Care, Similac NeoSure, Enfamil NeuroPro EnfaCare, and Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier.

A premature baby’s digestive system is underdeveloped and can’t easily digest the proteins in cow’s milk. This is believed to trigger an inflammatory response that damages the fragile intestinal lining, leading to NEC. Human breast milk contains protective antibodies and immune cells that help a preemie’s gut mature and fight infection.

No. As of late 2025, there has not been a recall of these formulas specifically for the risk of NEC. The lawsuits are based on the manufacturers’ “failure to warn” about the known risks, not a specific contamination or manufacturing defect that would typically trigger a recall.

Symptoms can appear suddenly and include a swollen, hard, or discolored (red or blue) abdomen, bloody stools, green or yellow vomit, difficulty feeding, lethargy (sluggishness), and changes in heart rate, breathing, or body temperature.

Section 2: Eligibility and Filing a Claim

You may be eligible to file a lawsuit if your child was born prematurely or with a low birth weight, was fed a cow’s milk-based formula (like Similac or Enfamil), and was subsequently diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis.

Not necessarily. Most states have a “discovery rule,” which means the time limit (statute of limitations) may not start until you discovered the link between the formula and your child’s NEC, which for many parents was only recently. It is crucial to speak with a lawyer immediately to understand the deadline in your state.

The deadline, or statute of limitations, varies by state but is typically two to three years. However, the “discovery rule” and special exceptions for injuries to minors can extend this deadline, so you should not assume it’s too late.

Yes. If you tragically lost your child to NEC, your family may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit. This type of claim seeks compensation for medical and funeral expenses, as well as for your family’s emotional distress and suffering.

This is very common, and you can still have a case. An experienced NEC lawyer can obtain and review your child’s hospital medical and feeding records to identify the exact products that were used.

It is less common, but you may still have a case. While the vast majority of NEC cases affect premature infants, full-term babies with other health issues can also develop NEC. It is best to consult an attorney to evaluate your specific situation.

Section 3: The Legal Process

The first step is to get a free case review from a law firm that specializes in these cases. They will listen to your story, review the basic facts, and determine if you may be eligible to file a claim. There is no cost or obligation for this consultation.

Ready to Fight for Your Compensation?

Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is Waiting!

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to call? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today.

There are no upfront costs. Reputable law firms handle these cases on a contingency-fee basis, which means they only get paid if they successfully recover compensation for you through a settlement or verdict.

No, it is a mass tort, which is handled through a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). In a mass tort, each family’s case remains individual, and compensation is based on the specific harm your child suffered. This is different from a class action, where all plaintiffs typically receive the same settlement amount.

MDL stands for Multidistrict Litigation. The NEC MDL (MDL 3026) is a process that consolidates all federal lawsuits into a single court in Illinois to streamline pretrial proceedings like evidence gathering. This makes the process more efficient for everyone involved.

Bellwether trials are “test cases” selected from the larger group of lawsuits in the MDL to be tried first. The outcomes of these trials help both sides understand how juries might respond to the evidence and often guide negotiations for a global settlement for the remaining cases.

These cases can take several months to a few years to resolve. The timeline depends on the complexity of the case and the progress of the larger MDL, including the results of the bellwether trials.

Section 4: Compensation and Settlements

As of late 2025, there has not been a global settlement for all the cases in the federal MDL. However, individual state court trials have resulted in massive verdicts for families, including a $60 million verdict against Enfamil’s maker and a $495 million verdict against Similac’s maker.

The value of each case is unique and depends on the severity of the injury. Legal experts estimate that potential payouts could range from $50,000 for cases with a full recovery to over $500,000 or even millions for cases involving wrongful death or severe, lifelong disabilities like short bowel syndrome.

Compensation can cover both economic and non-economic losses. This includes medical expenses (past and future), lost wages for parents, pain and suffering for both the child and family, and in tragic cases, wrongful death damages like funeral costs.

Section 5: Medical Questions

Survivors of severe NEC can face lifelong challenges, including short bowel syndrome, intestinal scarring (strictures), growth failure, and neurodevelopmental delays like cerebral palsy.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a serious condition that can occur after surgery for NEC, where a large portion of the intestine is removed. The remaining bowel is too short to absorb enough nutrients and fluids, often requiring lifelong intravenous nutrition (PN).

Doctors diagnose NEC based on symptoms like a swollen belly and bloody stools, combined with an abdominal X-ray. The X-ray may show a bubbly appearance in the intestinal wall (pneumatosis intestinalis) or air that has leaked into the abdomen, which are key signs of the disease.

Colic is a pattern of intense crying in an otherwise healthy baby, while reflux is simple spitting up. NEC is a medical emergency with severe, systemic symptoms like a hard, discolored belly, bloody stools, and green vomit. A baby with NEC is visibly and seriously ill, which is very different from a “happy spitter” or a colicky but healthy infant.

Section 6: Legal Strategy and Evidence

The most important evidence is your child’s medical records. These records should show that your baby was born prematurely, was fed a cow’s milk-based formula, and was diagnosed with NEC. Your lawyer will help you gather all necessary documentation.

Under HIPAA, you have a legal right to your child’s medical records. You can request them by contacting the hospital’s Medical Records or Health Information Management (HIM) department and filling out an “Authorization to Release Health Information” form. Your lawyer can also handle this entire process for you.

The primary defense strategy for Abbott and Mead Johnson is to deny that their formulas cause NEC. They argue that NEC is a multifactorial disease of prematurity and that there is no “conclusive” scientific proof of causation.

Bellwether trials are “test cases” selected from the larger group of lawsuits in the MDL to be tried first. The outcomes of these trials help both sides understand how juries might respond to the evidence and often guide negotiations for a global settlement for the remaining cases.

No. Because the NEC lawsuits are a national mass tort, with many cases consolidated in a federal MDL, you can hire the best and most experienced law firm in the country, regardless of where you live. They can file a claim for you in the appropriate court.

About Jennifer McDonald

Jennifer McDonald is a seasoned content writer in the mass tort industry, specializing in creating engaging and informative articles. With over two years of experience, she excels in simplifying complex legal concepts and making them accessible to readers. Jennifer's writing style is casual and conversational, making her work relatable and easy to understand.

View all posts by author

More Legal Updates

Congress investigates Uber

Congress Investigates Uber’s Handling of Sexual Assault Claims

When Congress investigates Uber and its role in handling sexual assault claims, survivors and their families need clarity, reassurance, and a path forward after trauma. Key Takeaways: The Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuit ◆ The Legal Claim: Failure to Protect. Hundreds of lawsuits are being filed against rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft. The core legal […]

rideshare assault lawyer

Choosing the Right Attorney for Your Rideshare Assault Claim

Experiencing an assault during a rideshare is a profound violation of trust. If you are a survivor, finding the right rideshare assault lawyer is the first, crucial step toward healing and holding the responsible parties accountable. You may feel overwhelmed, confused, and unsure where to turn. You are not alone, and you have legal rights. […]

Uber leaked documents

How Leaked Documents Reveal Uber’s Safety Failures

When you order a rideshare, you place your trust—and your safety—in the hands of a massive corporation. You expect to be safe. But the Uber leaked documents, known globally as “The Uber Files,” paint a disturbing picture. They suggest the company may have prioritized aggressive global growth over protecting its passengers and drivers, potentially putting […]

Check Your Eligibility

Our legal network reviews claims for all active litigations listed on this site. 100% Free & Confidential.

210-940-9440

Secure Evaluation

We match you with independent attorneys specializing in your specific injury type.

Legal Case Assistant Chatbot
Julia A. Hinckley

Hello there!

I'm Julia, your Legal Case Assistant. Would you like to check if you qualify for a free case evaluation?

Julia
Hi there! I can evaluate your case instantly!
The information you provide is confidential.
Julia A. Hinckley

Julia A. Hinckley

Free Case Evaluation
. . .