Loading...

24/7 Case Review: 210-940-9440
Call Now Free Case Evaluation
Baby Formula NEC

Baby Formula Failure to Warn: The Core Allegation in the Toxic Baby Formula Lawsuits

Jennifer McDonald

October 23, 2025

baby formula failure to warn

When a product is trusted to nourish the most vulnerable infants, the expectation of safety is absolute. Yet, hundreds of lawsuits allege a profound betrayal of that trust. The legal battle centers on a crucial concept: baby formula failure to warn.

Key Takeaways: The NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit

  • The Scientific Link: Decades of research show that cow’s milk-based baby formulas, such as Similac® and Enfamil®, significantly increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. NEC is a severe and often fatal intestinal disease that causes inflammation and death of intestinal tissue.
  • The Legal Claim: Hundreds of families are filing lawsuits against manufacturers Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson. The core legal argument is “failure to warn” — that the companies knew their products posed a deadly risk to preemies but deliberately chose not to add a warning label for parents and doctors.
  • Your Family’s Rights: If your premature infant was fed a cow’s milk-based formula in the hospital and was later diagnosed with NEC, your family may be eligible to seek significant compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and more. Our team is actively investigating these claims to help families get the justice they deserve.

Ready to Fight for Your Compensation?

Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is Waiting!

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to call? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today

What Does “Failure to Warn” Mean in Product Liability Law?

Under product liability law, a product can be considered defective not just because of a flaw in its design or manufacturing, but also because of inadequate instructions or warnings. This is known as a “failure to warn” or a marketing defect.  

The principle is straightforward: companies have a legal duty to inform consumers about any significant dangers or risks associated with their products, especially those that are not immediately obvious. This duty applies even if the product is made exactly as intended.  

To be considered adequate, a warning must be clear, conspicuous, and easily understood by the average user. A manufacturer can be held liable for failing to warn about risks they knew about or, critically, should have known about through reasonable testing and research.

How “Failure to Warn” Applies to the NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits

The baby formula failure to warn allegation is the central legal argument in the hundreds of lawsuits filed against Abbott Laboratories (maker of Similac®) and Mead Johnson (maker of Enfamil®).  

Families claim these companies knew for decades that their cow’s milk-based formulas and fortifiers significantly increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants, yet they deliberately chose not to put a warning on their products.  

This isn’t based on new science. The link between bovine-based formula and NEC has been documented for over 30 years. A landmark 1990 study in the medical journal The Lancet found that formula-fed premature infants were 6 to 10 times more likely to develop NEC than those fed exclusively human milk. The U.S. Surgeon General and the American Academy of Pediatrics have also issued statements highlighting the protective benefits of human milk and the risks associated with formula for preemies.  

Lawsuits allege that despite this overwhelming scientific evidence, the manufacturers continued to aggressively market their products to hospitals and parents as safe, necessary, and medically endorsed for premature infants, without disclosing the specific and severe risk of NEC.  

A product designed to nourish the most fragile infants should not carry a hidden, life-threatening risk. When a company fails to warn, it fails to protect.

The Devastating Consequences of Inadequate Warnings

By omitting a clear warning about the risk of NEC, these companies allegedly deprived parents and medical professionals of the ability to give true informed consent. In the high-stakes environment of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), a warning label could have prompted critical conversations about feeding choices, leading parents and doctors to insist on an exclusive human milk diet.  

Without that warning, countless premature infants were fed these products, and many developed NEC. The consequences of this disease are catastrophic and often lifelong, including:

  • Emergency surgery to remove dead intestinal tissue.  
  • The need for an ostomy bag.
  • Short bowel syndrome, a condition that impairs the body’s ability to absorb nutrients and may require lifelong intravenous nutrition.  
  • Severe neurodevelopmental delays, including cerebral palsy, due to widespread infection and inflammation.  
  • Death. The mortality rate for infants with NEC can be as high as 40%.  

Proving a Baby Formula Failure to Warn Case

To succeed in a baby formula failure to warn lawsuit, a family’s legal team must prove several key elements:

  1. The Product Was Dangerous: They must show that cow’s milk-based formula poses an unreasonable danger to premature infants. The decades of medical research are used as primary evidence.  
  2. The Manufacturer Knew of the Danger: Plaintiffs use the companies’ own internal documents, alongside published scientific studies, to argue the manufacturers knew or should have known about the NEC risk.  
  3. The Manufacturer Failed to Provide an Adequate Warning: The absence of any specific warning about NEC on product packaging or marketing materials is direct evidence of this failure.  
  4. The Failure to Warn Caused the Injury: The legal argument is that if an adequate warning had been provided, the infant would have been fed a safer alternative (like donor breast milk), and would not have developed NEC.  

These cases have been consolidated into a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Illinois to manage the hundreds of similar claims efficiently. Recent jury verdicts have been overwhelmingly in favor of the families, including a $60 million verdict in Illinois and a landmark $495 million verdict in Missouri. These outcomes show that juries are holding these companies accountable for their alleged failure to protect the most vulnerable babies.  

Ready to Take the First Step Toward Justice?

Speak with our trusted legal team today. Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is waiting — and it only takes a minute to begin.

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to talk now? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today

Secure Form 100% Secure & Confidential | No Obligation No Obligation Consultation

By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by a trusted legal partner for a free case review. This does not create an attorney-client relationship. Confidential and secure.

The legal principle of “failure to warn” is about corporate responsibility and a consumer’s right to make informed choices. When that right is denied, especially with a product for fragile infants, the law provides a path to hold manufacturers accountable.

EXTERNAL SOURCES

  1. Justia – Failure to Warn Legal Overview: https://www.justia.com/products-liability/types-of-products-liability-claims/failure-to-warn/
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH) – Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC): https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/nec
  3. Reuters – Abbott hit with $495 million verdict in first trial over baby formula: https://www.reuters.com/legal/abbott-hit-with-495-mln-verdict-first-trial-over-baby-formula-2024-07-26/

“Justice for your child has a deadline. In NEC lawsuits, delay equals denial. Act now.”

— Visit MassTortTraffic.com or Call (+1) 210-940-9440

Frequently Asked Questions About the NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit

Section 1: The Basics of NEC and the Lawsuit

The lawsuits allege that manufacturers of cow’s milk-based formulas, specifically Abbott Laboratories (maker of Similac®) and Mead Johnson (maker of Enfamil®), knew for decades that their products significantly increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants but failed to warn parents and doctors.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious and often life-threatening intestinal disease that primarily affects premature and low-birth-weight infants. It causes severe inflammation that can destroy intestinal tissue, leading to a hole (perforation) in the gut, which can cause overwhelming infections like sepsis.

The lawsuits primarily name cow’s milk-based products from Similac and Enfamil that are designed for premature infants. These include specialized formulas and “human milk fortifiers” (which are also bovine-based) such as Similac Special Care, Similac NeoSure, Enfamil NeuroPro EnfaCare, and Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier.

A premature baby’s digestive system is underdeveloped and can’t easily digest the proteins in cow’s milk. This is believed to trigger an inflammatory response that damages the fragile intestinal lining, leading to NEC. Human breast milk contains protective antibodies and immune cells that help a preemie’s gut mature and fight infection.

No. As of late 2025, there has not been a recall of these formulas specifically for the risk of NEC. The lawsuits are based on the manufacturers’ “failure to warn” about the known risks, not a specific contamination or manufacturing defect that would typically trigger a recall.

Symptoms can appear suddenly and include a swollen, hard, or discolored (red or blue) abdomen, bloody stools, green or yellow vomit, difficulty feeding, lethargy (sluggishness), and changes in heart rate, breathing, or body temperature.

Section 2: Eligibility and Filing a Claim

You may be eligible to file a lawsuit if your child was born prematurely or with a low birth weight, was fed a cow’s milk-based formula (like Similac or Enfamil), and was subsequently diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis.

Not necessarily. Most states have a “discovery rule,” which means the time limit (statute of limitations) may not start until you discovered the link between the formula and your child’s NEC, which for many parents was only recently. It is crucial to speak with a lawyer immediately to understand the deadline in your state.

The deadline, or statute of limitations, varies by state but is typically two to three years. However, the “discovery rule” and special exceptions for injuries to minors can extend this deadline, so you should not assume it’s too late.

Yes. If you tragically lost your child to NEC, your family may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit. This type of claim seeks compensation for medical and funeral expenses, as well as for your family’s emotional distress and suffering.

This is very common, and you can still have a case. An experienced NEC lawyer can obtain and review your child’s hospital medical and feeding records to identify the exact products that were used.

It is less common, but you may still have a case. While the vast majority of NEC cases affect premature infants, full-term babies with other health issues can also develop NEC. It is best to consult an attorney to evaluate your specific situation.

Section 3: The Legal Process

The first step is to get a free case review from a law firm that specializes in these cases. They will listen to your story, review the basic facts, and determine if you may be eligible to file a claim. There is no cost or obligation for this consultation.

Ready to Fight for Your Compensation?

Your Free, Confidential, No-Obligation Case Evaluation is Waiting!

GET YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW →

Prefer to call? Call (+1) 210-940-9440 Today.

There are no upfront costs. Reputable law firms handle these cases on a contingency-fee basis, which means they only get paid if they successfully recover compensation for you through a settlement or verdict.

No, it is a mass tort, which is handled through a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). In a mass tort, each family’s case remains individual, and compensation is based on the specific harm your child suffered. This is different from a class action, where all plaintiffs typically receive the same settlement amount.

MDL stands for Multidistrict Litigation. The NEC MDL (MDL 3026) is a process that consolidates all federal lawsuits into a single court in Illinois to streamline pretrial proceedings like evidence gathering. This makes the process more efficient for everyone involved.

Bellwether trials are “test cases” selected from the larger group of lawsuits in the MDL to be tried first. The outcomes of these trials help both sides understand how juries might respond to the evidence and often guide negotiations for a global settlement for the remaining cases.

These cases can take several months to a few years to resolve. The timeline depends on the complexity of the case and the progress of the larger MDL, including the results of the bellwether trials.

Section 4: Compensation and Settlements

As of late 2025, there has not been a global settlement for all the cases in the federal MDL. However, individual state court trials have resulted in massive verdicts for families, including a $60 million verdict against Enfamil’s maker and a $495 million verdict against Similac’s maker.

The value of each case is unique and depends on the severity of the injury. Legal experts estimate that potential payouts could range from $50,000 for cases with a full recovery to over $500,000 or even millions for cases involving wrongful death or severe, lifelong disabilities like short bowel syndrome.

Compensation can cover both economic and non-economic losses. This includes medical expenses (past and future), lost wages for parents, pain and suffering for both the child and family, and in tragic cases, wrongful death damages like funeral costs.

Section 5: Medical Questions

Survivors of severe NEC can face lifelong challenges, including short bowel syndrome, intestinal scarring (strictures), growth failure, and neurodevelopmental delays like cerebral palsy.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a serious condition that can occur after surgery for NEC, where a large portion of the intestine is removed. The remaining bowel is too short to absorb enough nutrients and fluids, often requiring lifelong intravenous nutrition (PN).

Doctors diagnose NEC based on symptoms like a swollen belly and bloody stools, combined with an abdominal X-ray. The X-ray may show a bubbly appearance in the intestinal wall (pneumatosis intestinalis) or air that has leaked into the abdomen, which are key signs of the disease.

Colic is a pattern of intense crying in an otherwise healthy baby, while reflux is simple spitting up. NEC is a medical emergency with severe, systemic symptoms like a hard, discolored belly, bloody stools, and green vomit. A baby with NEC is visibly and seriously ill, which is very different from a “happy spitter” or a colicky but healthy infant.

Section 6: Legal Strategy and Evidence

The most important evidence is your child’s medical records. These records should show that your baby was born prematurely, was fed a cow’s milk-based formula, and was diagnosed with NEC. Your lawyer will help you gather all necessary documentation.

Under HIPAA, you have a legal right to your child’s medical records. You can request them by contacting the hospital’s Medical Records or Health Information Management (HIM) department and filling out an “Authorization to Release Health Information” form. Your lawyer can also handle this entire process for you.

The primary defense strategy for Abbott and Mead Johnson is to deny that their formulas cause NEC. They argue that NEC is a multifactorial disease of prematurity and that there is no “conclusive” scientific proof of causation.

Bellwether trials are “test cases” selected from the larger group of lawsuits in the MDL to be tried first. The outcomes of these trials help both sides understand how juries might respond to the evidence and often guide negotiations for a global settlement for the remaining cases.

No. Because the NEC lawsuits are a national mass tort, with many cases consolidated in a federal MDL, you can hire the best and most experienced law firm in the country, regardless of where you live. They can file a claim for you in the appropriate court.

About Jennifer McDonald

Jennifer McDonald is a seasoned content writer in the mass tort industry, specializing in creating engaging and informative articles. With over two years of experience, she excels in simplifying complex legal concepts and making them accessible to readers. Jennifer's writing style is casual and conversational, making her work relatable and easy to understand.

View all posts by author

More Legal Updates

Congress investigates Uber

Congress Investigates Uber’s Handling of Sexual Assault Claims

When Congress investigates Uber and its role in handling sexual assault claims, survivors and their families need clarity, reassurance, and a path forward after trauma. Key Takeaways: The Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuit ◆ The Legal Claim: Failure to Protect. Hundreds of lawsuits are being filed against rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft. The core legal […]

rideshare assault lawyer

Choosing the Right Attorney for Your Rideshare Assault Claim

Experiencing an assault during a rideshare is a profound violation of trust. If you are a survivor, finding the right rideshare assault lawyer is the first, crucial step toward healing and holding the responsible parties accountable. You may feel overwhelmed, confused, and unsure where to turn. You are not alone, and you have legal rights. […]

Uber leaked documents

How Leaked Documents Reveal Uber’s Safety Failures

When you order a rideshare, you place your trust—and your safety—in the hands of a massive corporation. You expect to be safe. But the Uber leaked documents, known globally as “The Uber Files,” paint a disturbing picture. They suggest the company may have prioritized aggressive global growth over protecting its passengers and drivers, potentially putting […]

Check Your Eligibility

Our legal network reviews claims for all active litigations listed on this site. 100% Free & Confidential.

210-940-9440

Secure Evaluation

We match you with independent attorneys specializing in your specific injury type.

Legal Case Assistant Chatbot
Julia A. Hinckley

Hello there!

I'm Julia, your Legal Case Assistant. Would you like to check if you qualify for a free case evaluation?

Julia
Hi there! I can evaluate your case instantly!
The information you provide is confidential.
Julia A. Hinckley

Julia A. Hinckley

Free Case Evaluation
. . .